Jessica Entwistle
March 23 2026
Security reporting today highlights the continued impact of access control drift, the risks associated with privilege creep, and the importance of validating governance processes over time. As environments evolve, access controls often expand without structured review.
Recent analysis shows that access permissions frequently change as systems evolve, teams grow and responsibilities shift. Without regular review, controls can drift away from their original secure state.
These changes are often gradual and difficult to detect.
Why it matters
Maintaining alignment between access controls and business requirements helps reduce unintended exposure.
Source: Identity governance reporting
Security research highlights that users and service accounts often accumulate additional permissions over time. Temporary access granted for projects or support activities may not always be removed.
This leads to broader access than necessary.
Why it matters
Applying least privilege consistently reduces the impact of potential compromise.
Source: Access management analysis
Industry commentary reinforces that organisations are placing greater emphasis on validating governance processes, not just defining them. Regular reviews, audits and testing help ensure controls remain effective.
This approach improves accountability and visibility.
Why it matters
Validation ensures governance processes operate as intended in real-world environments.
Source: Security governance commentary
Access control is not a one-time activity. By regularly reviewing permissions, applying least privilege and validating governance processes, organisations can reduce risk while maintaining operational flexibility and clarity.
If you would like support reviewing access controls or strengthening identity governance, speak to the Secarma team: